Skip to content

Conversation

@mnd999
Copy link
Contributor

@mnd999 mnd999 commented Sep 19, 2024

Replace with new option existingDataSeedServer

Documenting https://github.com/neo-technology/neo4j/pull/27123

Replace with new option `existingDataSeedServer`
@mnd999 mnd999 added dev team-cypher-operations Cypher operations should review this labels Sep 19, 2024
@HannesSandberg HannesSandberg self-assigned this Sep 20, 2024
|
Controls how the system handles existing data on disk when creating the database.
Currently, this is only supported with `existingDataSeedInstance` and `seedURI`, and must be set to `use`, which indicates the existing data files should be used for the new database.
Currently, this is only supported with `existingDataSeedInstance`, `existingDataSeedServer` and `seedURI`, and must be set to `use`, which indicates the existing data files should be used for the new database.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can not make a comment above. But we should mention existingDataSeedServer on row 34 as well.

@renetapopova renetapopova self-requested a review September 25, 2024 12:17
@renetapopova renetapopova self-assigned this Sep 25, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@renetapopova renetapopova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @mnd999. It looks good; I have just two minor suggestions.

@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

neo-technology-commit-status-publisher commented Oct 9, 2024

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

@renetapopova renetapopova merged commit 6c22c13 into neo4j:dev Oct 9, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

5.25 dev team-cypher-operations Cypher operations should review this

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants